01 Apr

Denver Life-Changing Stories

By Carol Bolden

Like the American Revolution, the Revelation Speaks Peace (RSP) seminar, held at the Ellie Caulkins Opera House during the month of January in downtown Denver, is history. There’s no more preparation, no more organization. The long months of groundwork and execution are past, yet there is still work to do.

According to Eric Nelson, RMC vice president for administration, each Denver-metro church has as many as 600 interests to disciple which involves continued Bible studies, building friendships, invitations to church and other events; in other words, continued evangelism. The 200 requests for baptism made during the series are expected to rise as more are mentored.

Looking back at 2017, we see Denver-metro churches reaching out to community members by dozens of church members sharing Bible truths, fanning out across the Denver-metro area making contact, making friends, studying and praying with the hundreds who responded to the Voice of Prophecy mailings offering Bible studies. Lives were changed and baptisms took place even before the seminar began.

The harvest continued during the event and, by its end, it was evident the series would persist in impacting lives as members maintain Bible studies and connect with RSP visitors.

Numerous guests came to the Revelation Speaks Peace meetings for varied reasons and needs. One found an RSP handbill in a trashcan. Another came after being released from prison. Some were battling disease, gang involvement, alcohol, drug use, and homelessness. Many were searching for a deeper understanding of Scripture. Not every story is known, but the cross-section of those who shared their stories point to a populace hungry for meaning.

The first night of the month-long meetings, January 5, saw 1,340 attendees which swelled to 1,672 one Sabbath later in the month. Some weeknights saw as few as 500, yet week- ends always brought the crowds again. As the seminar continued through the month of January, the numbers shifted from a majority of guests to a majority of church members.

Although some young people attended, it became obvious that the timing of the event was not convenient for the younger crowd who face nightly homework. The offering of music at the event would not necessarily appeal to today’s young crowd. “I thought the music fit very well into the opera setting,” commented Vivien Vasquez, a volunteer greeter at the meetings. But, while the music may have been somewhat old-fashioned, there were many who appreciated the music style and the message expressed in its lyrics.

Denver-metro pastors from 30 churches, involved from the beginning, continued throughout the meetings connecting Bible study interests with Bible study teachers, meeting with VOP leaders for planning sessions, opening the meetings with and making themselves available for prayer, and filling volunteer positions as greeters, Discover Bible Study Guide coordinators, ushers, and prayer warriors. During their final wrap-up meeting following the series, pastors expressed a desire to continue evangelism as a team each year, or at least every other year.

Many members, and even pastors, who no longer believe in the efficacy of public evangelism were moved by the response they saw to messages given from the platform during Revelation Speaks Peace.

Ushers who work for the Ellie Caulkins Opera House facility were frequently seen inside the auditorium listening to the messages, some even requesting prayer from pastors. These ushers expressed their appreciation for the meetings and wanted them to be a yearly event, one even saying, “I’m going to cry when you leave.”

The Newday Parker church plant in downtown Denver, which opened just before RSP began, had hoped to attract people from the meetings and give them a place to worship. They were disappointed that this hope did not prove true. Even so, they are involved in numerous outreach ventures aimed at blessing marginalized people in their area.

Myriad stories could be told of those in attendance. Christian Martin, pastor of Denver South Church, shared the story of Angel who is in his early 20s and paralyzed from the waist down. It was while Angel was hospitalized and waiting for an ultrasound that he prayed asking God why this had happened to him. In the middle of the prayer, Denver South Church member and ultrasound technician, Kevin, entered. There followed a spiritual conversation, which ended with prayer and a promise to stay in touch. The following week when the Discover Bible School initiative was launched, Kevin offered to study with Angel who was definitely interested, as were his mother, his brother, and his brother’s girlfriend. When the Revelation Speaks Peace seminar neared, Angel asked Kevin to take him to the meetings. This is just one story among many that could be shared.

“Some of the stories developing moved me deeply,” said RSP speaker Shawn Boonstra. “Based on past experience, I expect we may see as many as two or three hundred decisions when the dust settles.”

–Carol Bolden provides editorial support for the RMC communication department. Email her at: [email protected]

01 Apr

Infectious Authenticity!

By Rajmund Dabrowski

Making a pledge is an obvious step to take. We do this before January 1 each year, or on a birthday. We do this looking into a mirror, limiting our gaze only to our face. We then create a list of promises to work on, and the usual journey takes us downhill. As they say, promises are easily broken.

Admittedly, my promises are created to transform into feelings of guilt when the good intentions falter. My guilt, and not the fulfillment of promises, has an easier start and finish in my daily life. One day, a week, or a month quickly turns into another, and so on, with promises cast aside.

An experience from a few years ago comes to mind.

We had a good friend who lived in Sedona, Arizona. Mary Schnack passed away a few years ago, but apart from professional interests and collaborations, what remains in Grazyna’s and my memories are many a moment we spent trekking the red-rock trails of “God’s country” as Mary called it.

She lived just under the Coffee Pot Rock landmark, and a short distance from St. John Vianney Church. By chance, I observed an after-Christmas service there once.

What’s vivid in my memory is the sound of a nearly empty church, its silence broken by the hard-hitting steps of a minister walking from the back of the church nave. The sound meant he knew his destination.

My eyes were drawn to the space associated with the language of the steps, revealing well-worn cowboy boots with a hint of jeans showing slightly below his vestments.

It was not so much what I saw, but what this short, bearded man in his forties shared in his equally short homily that made a difference. Later, I learned that many Sedonians referred to him as J.C., and his presence was felt outside the walls of his church. He was something of a fixture in the local lore.

A memory of what I heard that morning jumped at me on that chilly morning. J.C. told a story about a good-for- nothing seminary mate of his who phoned him wondering if J.C. lives by what he preaches. All of a sudden I was confronted by a lot of stuff the preacher told the congregation. “What pillow do you have under your head? It’s soft, isn’t it? And what’s your duvet like? Warm, right?”

Whatever was said next, it was set against the importance of being rather than having, all seasoned with personal honesty. My nagging thought that morning was this: Make yourself useful in the lives of those who will cross your path today. That’s what Jesus will help you with.

An invitation ended that short reflection by J.C. “Look outside. The sun is shining brightly. Like the sun, I wish the love of Jesus Christ goes with you. Go, and be love to others. Live love,” he said.

This memory lingers on with a daily challenge: Instead of waiting for someone else to be love I am inviting myself to make the world better by getting out of my shell in order to become more responsive to the disenfranchised and the needy.

That’s the challenge I am throwing at myself again.

And if a wish is in order, may your authentic life be spiced with love. May it be infectious through the love of Jesus. Daily.

–Rajmund Dabrowski is RMC communication director and editor of Mountain Views. Email him at [email protected].

01 Apr

How Leaders Lead

By Ed Barnett

Recently, I returned to a book that I have read many times over the last twenty years and decided to order a copy for each of our pastors and everyone working in our Conference office.

The Way of the Shepherd by Dr. Kevin Leman and Bill Pentak is a small volume, but it contains very practical recommendations, and is an easy read. Many Mountain Views readers, especially those who are involved with various local church positions, would benefit from the valuable lessons it contains.

The authors share seven “secrets” to managing productive people and illustrate practical, logical management approaches for those who are leading people. Whether in the business world or the church, the principles found in this book apply.

Biblical principles of dealing with people are timeless. I find many business principles have their roots in the Bible and Christianity. For instance, lying and manipulating people is wrong in business and especially in the work of the church. As we read in the Gospels, and subsequently the Book of Acts, we recognize a number of principles shared by our First Shepherd who gave us practical principles of leadership. Leaders in the early church could organize the church as they were sheep first, led by a Master Teacher, and the Master Teacher had modeled this. The Way of the Shepherd expresses the secrets of leadership, connecting them to the contemporary needs seen and experienced in our faith community.

It’s the sheep that the book uses to illustrate what one needs to know when leading people. The seven secrets or principles go like this:

Know the Condition of Your Flock. You must know the people you are working with and leading. You must know what they do for their specific job. As a leader, you have to engage with them regularly and consistently.

Discover the Shape of Your Sheep. The people you pull into work or service in different areas in a church, school, or business must be suited for the job. Be careful who you choose for different positions. Make sure that people are in the area they have a passion for.

Help Your Sheep Identify With You. Build trust by modeling honesty, authenticity, and compassion with your team. Communicate your values and goals and let people know the importance of the part they play. Remember leadership is personal.

Make Your Pasture a Safe Place. Keep your folks informed of what is going on. Change people out of positions who aren’t working. Let people know that they are critical in their area of expertise. Don’t let problems fester and get too big. Keep things fresh and safe.

The Staff of Direction. Know where you are going and stay in front as a leader to keep things moving. Set boundaries, but give people freedom to work in their area. When people get in trouble, be there to help them out of it. Let people know that mistakes happen.

The Rod of Correction. Stand in the gap and fight for your sheep. Correction needs to take place from time to time, but look at it as an opportunity for growth. Regularly check on your people and the projects moving forward.

The Heart of the Shepherd. Leadership is a lifestyle, not a technique. Be there for your people, and most of all, have a heart for your sheep.

Leadership is absolutely critical for our churches and schools to grow. Time after time, I have seen churches or schools that are falling apart and nothing is working to turn them around. Then, a new pastor or principal/lead teacher comes in and, in a short time, things are turned around and they are growing again. The Way of the Shepherd may just be a guidebook to turn things around wherever you are involved.

–Ed Barnett is RMC president. Email him at: [email protected]

01 Apr

On becoming truly changed

By Ron Price

When I was six years old, my mother started checking out of my life. As I recall, she would be gone for days, weeks, perhaps even months at a time for a period of two years. She would just come and go, and then one day she never returned. I have not seen my mother since I was eight years young.

About ten years ago, I related this story to a biblical, prayer-oriented counselor who prayed and asked God to show me anything I needed to know and understand about how that life circumstance had impacted me through the years. I vividly recall God giving me a clear picture of myself as an eight-year-old saying, “If my mother really loved me, she wouldn’t have left me.” Now that makes perfect sense until I tell you that shortly after my sixth birthday, Mom was diagnosed with cancer. She spent the next two years in and out of hospitals for various periods of time and then shortly after my eighth birthday she lost the fight and died.

Knowing this new information, does it make any sense that I would tell myself that if she really loved me, she would not have left me? Is death by cancer a suicide or an intentional act? The obvious answer is no, yet I believed it and subconsciously continued to believe it for decades until God showed up and revealed to me the truth of my situation. Stay with me on this just for a moment. If your own mother did not love you—or if you simply believed she did not love you—how lovable could you possibly be? And that, I’m sorry to say, was my reality. As I look back over my life, I can see how this horrible thought drove me to try to get people to love me in hopes that their love might help me to feel lovable.

As your brother in Christ, may I offer a challenge to you to reflect back on your life and consider what lies you have believed that have impacted you in negative ways? For the purposes of this article, I want to focus on one particular lie that I know is common to many of us. You have likely had a thought in your mind that goes something like, “Who do you think you are to be telling others about Christ when you are such a hypocrite?” Or perhaps, “A real Christian would never have a thought like that—who do you think you’re fooling?”

Do these sound familiar? If so, it is because they come from the same source—our common enemy known as the devil or satan (he does not deserve capitalization). He has become very adept at getting us to think so lowly of ourselves that we hesitate to reach out to others in love and acceptance.

At the beginning of this year, I embarked on a 21-day brain detox program developed by Dr. Caroline Leaf, a Christian neuroscientist. Over the course of the program, I countered the oft-occurring thought that I am not good enough or worthy to be called a Christian, and replaced it with the reality that I am at peace with God, therefore I can be at peace with myself, and since I am at peace with myself I can be at peace with others.

I have recently observed myself being so much more accepting of visitors who come to our church looking different, or acting in a manner other than how I think a “real Christian” should look or act. As I encounter people in the course of my day, I find myself showing more appreciation and understanding than I ever have before.

What I am saying here should not be misapplied. This is not about how wonderful I am or have become. Like you, I am very much a work in progress, but I wonder what our churches would be like if everyone adopted a similar positive perspective for themselves and others?.

Here are a few questions to consider:

Might our churches become more loving, warmer, and welcoming to all who enter our doors?

Would visitors and members alike feel a greater sense of belonging and connection?

Might newly converted members be less likely to quickly exit as is unfortunately far too often the case?

Please understand this is not another version of self- help philosophy. It is more like what we read in Rom. 12:2 (NLT): “. . . let God transform you into a new person by changing the way you think,” or “and you will know the truth, and the truth will set you free” (Jn. 8:32), or 2 Cor. 10:5 where we are admonished to take “every thought captive to the mind of Christ.”

For me, the challenge is to focus on replacing a negative thought about who I am with a more accurate Christ-focused acceptance of who and Whose I truly am. Be advised, however, that despite our best efforts, we cannot change ourselves. Only Christ, living in us, can change you and me fully. Let Him be in charge. Invite Him to show you the erroneous thoughts that have hindered your Christian experience and witness over the years. Seek His help in overcoming them to become the person He intended you to be in the first place.

–Ron Price is a member of the RMC executive committee from Farmington, New Mexico, and is the author of Play Nice in Your Sandbox at Work. For further information or tips on how to move from negative to positive thinking, email him at: [email protected]

01 Apr

Reading the Bible – listening to God’s voice in 2018

By Reinder Bruinsma

How many Christian denominations are there in the world? Nobody knows exactly, but the number runs into the thousands. All have their peculiar beliefs and practices. How is this diversity to be explained, considering that they all take the Bible as their point of departure? And, looking at world-wide Adventism we cannot deny that there are differ- ent streams and different emphases. How can that be? Do we not all claim to follow the Bible?

The Seventh-day Adventist Church is currently struggling with the issue of women’s ordination. Those who feel that women pastors ought to be ordained base their view on the Bible. Likewise, those who oppose the ordination of female pastors are sure that the Bible supports their opinion.

Adventists clearly differ in the way they read the Bible. Some advocate a plain reading of Scripture and maintain that wherever possible the wording of the Bible must be taken literally. Many others reject that approach and believe that we must look for underlying principles as we read the Bible and look behind the historical and cultural back- ground to find the application for the twenty-first century.

The Paradox of God’s Word

The Christian faith confronts us with a number of paradoxes. A paradox is a statement that is seemingly contradictory or opposed to common sense, and yet is, somehow, true. The doctrine of the Trinity is a prime example. God is one and yet God is three. The doctrine of Christ presents us with another paradox: Christ is fully divine and at the same time fully human.

Similarly, the church is not only a community of saints, but also a school of sinners. In all these cases it is not one or the other. Two elements, though seemingly contradictory, must be held together, even though they seem to exclude each other. If one aspect is overemphasized or toned down, the result is imbalance or even heresy!

We do not only meet a paradox when we contemplate the Living Word—the person of Christ—but also when we come to the Written Word. The Bible is God’s Word, but at the same time it is also a human product, as two key texts tell us: “All Scripture is God-breathed!” (2 Tim. 3:16, NIV).

“Prophets, though human, spoke from God as they were carried along by the Holy Spirit” (2 Pet. 1:21, NIV).

If we only pay attention to the divine aspect of the Bible, we end up with a rigid concept of inspiration that creates all kinds of difficulties. On the other hand, if the human element is given too much emphasis at the expense of the divine origin, God’s Word loses it absolute authority.

Theologians have long debated the doctrine of inspiration. Two main theories stand out. Plenary or verbal inspiration is the view that every word in the Bible (in the original languages) was dictated by God to the Bible writers through His Spirit. Usually, those who defend this theory say that the Scriptures are inerrant (i.e., without any mistake or inconsistency).

This is not the official Seventh-day Adventist position. Adventists support the view of thought inspiration: God gave the thoughts to human authors, who then expressed these in their own words. Those Adventists who nonetheless adhere to the view of verbal inspiration would do well to remember that Ellen G. White disagreed with this and defended thought inspiration:

“The Bible is written by inspired men, but it is not God’s mode of thought and expression. It is that of humanity. God, as a writer, is not represented. Men will often say such an expression is not like God. But God has not put Himself in words, in logic, in rhetoric, on trial in the Bible. The writers of the Bible were God’s penmen, not His pen. Look at the different writers.

“It is not the words of the Bible that are inspired, but the men that were inspired. Inspiration acts not on the man’s words or his expressions but on the man himself, who, under the influence of the Holy Ghost, is imbued with thoughts. But the words receive the impress of the individual mind.” (1 Selected Messages, p. 21)

So, Where Do We Go?

The main problem with the plain reading of the Bible is that it tends to be very selective in what is taken literally or not. I suggest that we avoid getting caught up in a fruitless debate about terminology, and that we leave the term plain reading aside. When we wonder which approach to the reading of the Bible is correct, we must always start with the basic premise that in the Bible we may hear the voice of God. The Bible is more than a collection of devotional messages from ancient times that may encourage us and uplift us. In the Bible God reveals truth about Himself and His dealings with the world. Every other piece of writing is to be evaluated in the light of His Word.

Yet, paradoxically enough, we must be just as serious about the manner in which God allowed His Word to come to us. He used human beings as the vehicles for His revelation, who each used their own vocabulary and style. They used images and metaphors they were familiar with, and wrote against the background of their time and culture. They wrote in a world in which customs were different from what they are today—a world in which slavery was common and women were, as a rule, subservient to men. And so, the perfect divine Word comes to us through imperfect human words, in the kind of language human beings can understand. Some forty different authors, with wide-ranging linguistic skills, put the message God inspired them with into Hebrew, Aramaic, and Greek. And through the centuries, faithful servants of God have done their utmost to faithfully translate the Bible from the original languages into English, French, German, and thousands of other languages.

Bible Reading Needs the Spirit

Just as “God’s penmen” were dependent on the Holy Spirit when they wrote sections of the Bible, we need the same Spirit when we read their words. The Spirit must guide us, so that we can discover the underlying principles of what we read and gain the insights to apply these principles in our twenty-first century lives.

But what if serious readers, who ask for the guidance of the Spirit, come to different interpretations? Well, let us remember that we are all at different points in our spiritual journeys. And let us never forget that as long as we are in this world “we see only a reflection as in a mirror” (1 Cor. 13:12, NIV). But let us also be mindful of the fact that we have the privilege of belonging to a community of believers, in which we can learn from one another.

We can only prosper spiritually in this community if we are tolerant with one another and accept that others may not interpret every text in the same way as we do, and if we are prepared to adjust our thinking from time to time as we “grow in faith and knowledge of our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ” (2 Pet. 3:18, NIV).

–Reinder Bruinsma is a theologian, writer, and former church administrator. He writes from the Netherlands. Email him at: [email protected]

01 Apr

Act justly, love mercy, and walk humbly

By Zdravko Plantak, PhD

In Mic. 6:8 we read: “He has told you, O man, what is good; What does the Lord require of you? To do justice, to love kindness, and to walk humbly with your God!”

This is an extraordinary text that many regard as the pinnacle of religious and moral thought. The Talmud says that this verse, “by virtue of its three principles of doing justice, loving mercy, and walking humbly with God encapsulated the essence of all 613 commandments communicated to Moses.” A current biblical thinker describes it as “rightly celebrated as the supreme definition of ethical religion.”

In 1897, Charles W. Elliot, president of Harvard University, chose the second part of Mic. 6:8 to be inscribed above a statue symbolizing religion in the new Library of Congress building. In 1977, Jimmy Carter made it a focal point of his presidential inaugural address. So, one might ask, “What’s all the fuss? What does the Lord actually require from us?” Or, even more directly to God: “What do You want from us?”

You and I, “we mortals,” are reminded that God showed us what is good—what is “a better way,” what is truly moral, and what God requires in our life’s journey!

And we are given what one commentator calls “a trilogy of spiritual qualities that are as social as they are personal in nature.” Ronald Hyman, a professor at Rutgers University in New Jersey, suggested that this triplet’s conciseness and its emphasis on only three verbs—doing, loving, walking— connected to three basic moral values—justice, mercy, and humility—make it comprehensible and easy to remember. “The series of three pairs of ‘a verb tied to a moral value’ creates an appealing poetic rhythm. Together, they constitute a series that is a moral guideline for behavior among humans; a goal worth striving for.”

How will “acting justly” look in faith communities, and specifically in a Seventh-day Adventist community? Honestly, every one of us will have to wrestle with this question in the local community, the place where every “tire rubs the road.” Each of us has the responsibility to figure out how we will implement the notion of “doing acts of justice” and how we will fight for justice in a very unjust world. We seriously committed Christians are invited to ask ourselves how our world would look if acts of justice were being done for the underdogs and the marginalized, for the poorest of the poor, for the unarmed children in schools, for those who are defenseless and helpless. How will I become the voice for the voiceless and the power for the powerless (Prov. 31:3) in the world in which there are still more than 1.2 billion people who live in abject poverty in which 22,000 children still die each day from poverty and from diseases that we can prevent with drugs or health education? Three million children die from malnutrition every year.

How will we, as an alternative and remnant community, act justly when neo-Nazis and white supremacists start walking on our streets threatening to get rid of the Jews, or the blacks, or those who are by some other designation different, or marginal? But, of course, there will also be many others who will never come face to face with us—and yet, doing justice will mean that we will need to advocate for them as well.

So, what is the first thing that God actually requires when He commands us to act justly (mishpat)? The Hebrew term mishpat is not a colorless word but is defined again and again. For example, Ps. 82:3 gives the word a shine: “Give justice to the weak, and the orphan; maintain the

right of the lowly and destitute.” Martha Moore-Keish (of Columbia Theological Seminary), put it this way: God calls us back to justice, “which means caring for the poor and needy, the widow, and orphan. . . . Provide for your neighbor, says the Lord through Micah. Stop offering sacrifices to me and start offering sustenance to those who need it most.”

Please notice that the prophet does not say “admire justice,” or pay lip service in sermons or small group discussions, but act justly. The Bible is interested in the deeds, in the place where the rubber actually interacts with the road, in our practices and not only our theories. Let us not belittle deeds and practices which we employ in our faith-life. Our personal and professional lives are supposed to include a resolute resistance to the crying injustices in the world, and there are so many such sighs and cries that we hear daily in recent times.

“It is not enough to wish for justice or to complain because it is lacking. This is a dynamic concept that calls on God’s people to work for fairness and equality for all, particularly the weak and the powerless who are exploited by others” (New Interpreter’s Commentary). It is not even enough to come to worship on the right Sabbath day, as Amos and Isaiah explained to God’s people. (See, for example, Am. 5:18-24. and Isa. 58.) This is the first requirement. There is a story about a lady who came to a professional photographer seeking to get special portrait photos taken. She said to him: “I demand that these photos do me justice.” The artist looked at her from several angles, and then looked once again and he replied, “Madam, you do not need as much justice as you need grace.”

Frederick Buechner suggested that “justice also does not preclude mercy. It makes mercy possible. Justice is the pitch of the roof and the structure of the walls. Mercy is the patter of rain on the roof and the life sheltered by the walls. Justice is the grammar of things. Mercy is the poetry of things.”

And this connection brings us to the second requirement, which says: love mercy. To love people is one thing and to love mercy or kindness is another. Please note that here love is not a noun but a verb. We are not aiming at love but we love kindness and mercy. The object of love, in Micah’s case, is to pursue hesed—another rich Hebrew term with deep and varied meaning that can hardly be conveyed by any single English word. It is usually rendered as “faithfulness,” “loyalty,” “charity,” “merciful treatment of others,” or “kindness to those we are in a relationship with.”

In the 17th century, Stephen Charnock explained it beautifully: “The justice and mercy of God are united in a joint applause. . . . An eternal marriage is made between mercy and justice; both shake hands, and not only acquiesce but rejoice, . . . both pleased and both gratified. . . .” The third part of this profound threefold guide to moral life that God desires is a culmination because the first two parts deal with human-to-human relationships and this final part reflects the human-to-divine relationship. We mortals are requested to walk humbly with our God.

Walking is a metaphor for a life journey. Being on the way is more important than arriving. Christians are followers of the Way and often we are told that there are two possible paths, the wider one that leads us astray (or even to death), and the narrower one that yields life. (Deut. 30:15-20 and Matt. 7:13-14) Micah’s passage summons us to the path of “justice” and “kindness.” So, how are we to walk on that journey? Humility has often been misrepresented. Over the centuries, humility was described as groveling self-abasement through fraudulent piety.7

Nothing, however, could be further from the intent here in Micah. Walking humbly is opposite to walking proudly and pompously, or strutting. Prov. 30:28-31 illustrates such macho images of self-exhibiting as strutting—like a lion, a rooster, a he-goat, and a king.

Walter Brueggemann writes about such posturing in the following way: (Please note that this was written and published before the most recent political climate.) “As we have seen recently with so many ‘self-righteous’ politicians and ministers, such a strutting way often leads to embarrassment. . . . Such prideful strutting bespeaks arrogance, self-sufficiency, autonomy, the need to occupy center stage, the sense that I am the only one on the set.”

Pride of the one who struts depends on self-enhancement and self-congratulations, which leads to narcissism. Walking with your own ego is the dreariest and ugliest kind of walk that leads to ultimate alienation. Notice that the God we walk humbly with is called “your” God. What do we know about our God? It begs the question if we know what God is really like. It seems that American Christianity has recently made Jesus in our image, and “the American Jesus,” as we have seen in the recent examples of lack of discernment in terrible alliances between evangelical Christian leaders and politicians, leads to the often totally failed American Christianity. Our faith community needs to be warned, as the heirs of the radical Reformation, not to fall into this cultural trap and forget who may be Jesus Christ for us today, as Dietrich Bonhoeffer warned the German Christians 80 years ago.

There are so many biblically-unrecognizable Jesuses on offer today. But when you get to know the heart of the Jesus who cared, like every other prophet before Him, for the most vulnerable, the marginalized, the underdogs (yes, the widow, and orphan, and refuge-alien, and all those who are poor), you will not see the total eclipse of Christianity on offer today through the prosperity gospel and other utterly alien types of tamed and enculturated Christianity that side with corrupt practices, bigotry, and hate. Instead, what needs to happen is for Christians to take seriously again the call to act justly, to love mercy, and to walk closely to the biblical God who in humility laid down His own life for the sinner, for the fallen, for the bad, and for the lost.

So we are going (walking) somewhere rather than aimlessly and passively standing still. This companionship and developing friendship will inform us about our attitude to “our” God, the God we are in a relationship with, the God that we journey with. The view we have of God, and whether God is indeed our journey’s companion, will determine our humility and inform our perspective so that in the humility of that walk, we do what He requires of us and what He actually does in relationship with the world—that is doing justice and loving and affirming kindness and embracing, even more so loving, mercy. After all, Jesus in His famous first sermon on the Mount of Blessings, reiterates Micah’s message in Matt. 5:6-8: “Blessed are those who hunger and thirst for justice, for they will be filled. Blessed are the merciful, for they will receive mercy. Blessed are the pure in heart, for they will see God.”

Consider a story told by Lowell Cooper, a former General Conference vice-president. In an article titled “Doing Justice, Loving Mercy” he tells of a woman in her mid-30s who arrived early at the departure gate for her flight and had time to relax and to read her book. Moments passed and she suddenly leapt to her feet, turned to the person sitting near her, and exclaimed: “I left my phone in the car!” She looked at her watch, threw her book and jacket on the chair, cried “I’ll be back,” and headed down the corridor. Cooper writes, “The determination of an Olympic athlete was on her face though her body lacked Olympic- athlete fitness. Through the corridor, past security and check-in counters, out the door, across the road and down the walk to the parking lot, she reached her car, grabbed the phone, slammed the door and began the return journey. Out of breath, she arrived at the security line—the place where one experiences eternity in the present. After what seemed like a century, she made it through security and raced (slowly now) for the departure gate. Other passengers had already boarded. Without breaking stride, she grabbed her coat, presented her boarding pass and headed on to the plane. Clutching her phone, she made it just in time—but she had forgotten her book on the chair,

Under the stress of thinking about one important thing  (say, for example, worshipping on the right day or waiting for the soon coming of Christ) and concentrating our attention on the right doctrines, is there the danger of overlook- ing the other important aspects of what God might want from us? Is it possible that our single-minded thinking about the Advent might lead to an overriding attention to one aspect and the unintentional neglect of another issue, of “occupying while Jesus returns”? I hope we can get the phone and not forget the book at the departure gate.

Mic. 6:8: “Do justice, love mercy, and walk humbly” into the world of so many invisible injustices, the merciless and graceless world, and the world that is proud and trotting and lacking even a modest amount of humility.

–Zdravko Plantak, PhD, is chair of ethics and director of the Ethics Graduate Program and professor of religion and ethics at the School of Religion at Loma Linda University. Email him at: [email protected]

01 Apr

Everyone Welcome

By Nathan Brown

Across the road from my office at our church publishing house in Warburton, Australia, is our local Adventist church—and its sign board with movable letters on which the message is changed most Tuesdays. This sign sometimes advertises upcoming events or quotes occasional Bible verses, but most often announces that week’s preacher and/or sermon title with an invitation to attend.

I am intrigued by the various expressions of welcome that the sign employs from time to time. There are those that seem a contrast with the sermon title—perhaps “Sinners Are Condemned/ All Welcome” or something similar—and seem likely to be an unsuccessful invitation. The most common formulation is probably “[INSERT SERMON TITLE HERE]/ Everyone Welcome.” But, having not contacted me for the week’s sermon title, my most recent preaching appointment at this church was billboarded in this way: “This Week’s Preacher: Nathan Brown/Anyone Welcome.”

I was left reflecting on the distinction between “Everyone Welcome” and “Anyone Welcome.” In this instance, “everyone” and “anyone” can probably be used interchange- ably, but “anyone” seems a lesser welcome and risks a negative connotation. Perhaps one way of expressing it would be to distinguish between welcoming anyone who chooses to come—on an individual basis—rather than extending the sense of welcome to everyone who happens to see the sign that week, whatever their response.

Perhaps the distinction is so fine that it is only “word nerds” like me who would even reflect on it. Of course, the most important welcome—for either long-time members or first-time guests—is not what is posted on a sign, but our expression and practice of welcome and inclusion in church and as church. These do have important shades of meaning.

In the Book of Acts, the church began with this statement by Jesus: “You will receive power when the Holy Spirit comes upon you. And you will be my witnesses, telling people about me everywhere—in Jerusalem, throughout Judea, in Samaria, and to the ends of the earth” (Acts 1:8). The progression Jesus set out became the pattern for the remainder of the story, beginning in Jerusalem with ripples that spread further and further until we reach Paul in Rome, continuing to preach the good news about Jesus in the capital of the empire.

But this pattern also triggers a story of expanding inclusion in this newly inaugurated kingdom of God. Beginning with the Jews, these same ripples reach the Samaritans—of the “Good Samaritan” infamy—then Gentiles and ultimately peoples beyond Jewish imagination. In the process, so many others are caught up in this expanding reality, including women as disciples and leaders, eunuchs, and others outside acceptable understandings of holiness, persecutors and oppressors, soldiers and jailers, governors and kings.

Much of the tension among the early church leaders came from the fact that their theology could not keep pace with the expanding inclusivity of the kingdom of God and the action of God’s Spirit. Those who were coming to know God, both through their preaching or apart from it, challenged their Jewish assumptions and sensibilities.

In her provocative book Pastrix, Nadia Bolz-Weber points out that the story of the baptism of the Ethiopian eunuch (see Acts 8:26–40) might be better understood as the conversion of Philip. Through this story, Philip is the one repeatedly described as being directed by the Holy Spirit and his appeal comes in the question from the eunuch, “Look! There’s some water! Why can’t I be baptized?” (v. 36). In Philip’s theology, there were good reasons why this man should not be baptized (see Deut. 23:1). But God was doing something new and Philip responded to His leading.

This kind of scandalous inclusivity in the reach and response to the Gospel caused larger tensions, which came to a head in the Jerusalem council of Acts 15, which functions as a culmination of the first half of the Book of Acts. As well as Philip’s meeting with the Ethiopian, there had been Peter’s rooftop vision and subsequent ministry to Cornelius and his household, and the initial success of the missionary work of Paul and Barnabas. The church had grown rapidly from a small Jewish sect to an international, multi-cultural and majority-Gentile movement.

It is inherent in the nature of any human organization or group that it will seek to define who is included and who is excluded. In a sense, this is what makes them a definable group. And, of course, particularly from some in Jerusalem, there were the calls that these new believers had to become Jewish—to become “like us”—to be fully recognized as members of this new community.

While the mission reports seemed compelling, James— one of the leaders in the church in Jerusalem and probably the brother of Jesus—resolved the debate by drawing on the Old Testament teaching in Isa. 45. He urged that Jesus’ followers should expect that God does new things and that the church of Jesus must grow deeper, broader and more inclusive. James expressed it succinctly: “My judgment is that we should not make it difficult for the Gentiles who are turning to God” (Acts 15:19).

Of course, there are core beliefs and practices that are what it means to be a community of Jesus—and the Jerusalem council wrote to the new churches to encourage their faithfulness in such matters—but the conclusion of the council was that, no, we don’t all have to worship, look, live, practice, or even believe exactly alike to be full members of the faithful community of Jesus. And that it should not be difficult to turn to God in the context and culture of our church communities. As author Rachel Held Evans has put it, “What makes the gospel offensive isn’t who it keeps out, but who it lets in.”

More than a billboard sign, the Gospel mandates that everyone must be welcome. The experience of the early church was that wherever they felt the boundaries were settled, the Holy Spirit pushed them further. First- and second- century commentators lampooned and criticized the Christians for their scandalous inclusiveness. It was a marker of the reality of the work of God among them—and beyond them.

“Everyone Welcome” must not be merely a sign we put up; it must be a core practice of our faith in Jesus and our life together as His people today. If we are truly worshipping Jesus, anyone and everyone is always welcome to join us.

–Nathan Brown is a writer and editor at Signs Publishing in Warburton, Victoria, Australia. His most recent book is Engage: Faith that Matters. Email him at: [email protected]

01 Apr

A word to my fellow tenants

By Doug Inglish

Bring the full tithe into the storehouse, that there may be food in my house. And thereby put me to the test, says the Lord of hosts, if I will not open the windows of heaven for you and pour down for you a blessing until there is no more need. —Malachi 3:10 (ESV)

Having grown up in agricultural areas, I am familiar with the term tenant farming. Under this system, a landowner will enter an agreement with a tenant who will work the farm. When the harvest is brought in, the landowner and the tenant share the profits. This system allows those who prefer farming as a way of life and labor, but can’t yet afford to purchase the land, to still make a living off the land.

It’s a common practice, and there are numerous variations, but typically, a crop such as corn or soybeans will be split 50/50 between the landowner and the tenant. The market has determined that, depending on variables, that’s a fair division.

If you were a tenant farmer, and had been managing successfully under such an arrangement, would you consider moving to a different farm if the owner there offered you a 10/90 split? You turn over 10 percent of the crop to the landowner, and the rest is yours to take to market and get your best price. There isn’t a tenant farmer in the country who would turn down that offer!

That’s how good you have it when you faithfully tithe. God owns it all, and there are so many scriptural references to make that point that I don’t even feel the need to scatter them through this article. You know them already, and can doubtless recite a half dozen right now, without the use of a concordance. But as owner, He sets terms that no landowner could possibly afford to offer, and no tenant could afford to refuse: return a tenth, and the rest you may use as you see fit.

Of course, you can get a better deal than that. Most people do get a better deal than that, at least on paper. In fact, the majority of the members on the books of your church are getting what they consider a better deal. They have entered into a partnership in which they own nothing, but use the property of another for their own profit, and return nothing to the Owner. They claim citizenship in His kingdom, but don’t return a tithe.

They convince themselves that this is a good deal. In fact, they may believe it is the only deal they can afford. On paper, it looks like a sure winner from their perspective.

Obviously they don’t get to tap into the rich promises that are, once again, so common in the Bible that you can think of more than I have the space to mention. But they clearly believe that a 0/100 split with God in which the windows of heaven are shut is more profitable to them than a 10/90 split with the windows wide open (for those who are paying attention, that was an unmistakable reference to Mal. 3:10).

Well, I could easily talk about how you can’t come out ahead by keeping the tenth that the Owner asks in return, but you’ve heard that before, too. You may even have heard it from me, and if you haven’t yet you likely will, because I do make that point. But for now, I’m not going to go in that direction. I will just take it as fact that you already know the texts, you’ve heard the testimonies, and there might not be an angle on the formula you haven’t had presented to you in some fashion. Hopefully you are enjoying the blessings of that 10/90 partnership and have some of your own stories.

So, here is what I do want to say about returning the tenth to the owner: Even if I thought it was a better deal for me (which I don’t), and even if I believed I could get away with it (which, in the long run, no one can really get away with it), I still don’t want to keep the tenth.

Yes, you read that right. I don’t want 10 percent of my paycheck.

To understand why, let’s get back to the farm. If a person who had been laboring hard for decades under a 50/50 split were offered a position on a different farm under the terms of a 10/90 split, it would sound unbelievably good. If the ten- ant were then told by the new owner that while the deal is 10 percent in return for the use of the land, he or she would not be compelled to turn it over, I don’t think the tenant would believe their ears. But I do suspect that anyone who got that kind of a deal would nevertheless turn in the 10 percent faithfully for the rest of their lives.

There are some solid reasons why they would do this. A sense of obligation. Fear of losing the deal. An increase in living standards so significant that the 10 percent wouldn’t even be missed.

Or, most likely, simple gratitude. When the standard is 50/50, how can you begrudge a tenth to the One who gave you the opportunity of a lifetime?

That’s the kind of gratitude that makes me say I don’t want 10 percent of my paycheck. Now if the check came to me 10 percent short, you can believe I’d make my way to the payroll office to straighten it out. I never said I wanted the 10 percent to be left out, and don’t doubt for a minute that I absolutely do want it to be there. I want it in my hands, if only briefly, so I can have the joy that comes from placing it in the hands of the One who gave me the opportunity of a lifetime.

I’m happy for the blessings. I have many stories from my own experience, and thousands more that others have shared with me, of those heavenly windows pouring out. But I have a better reason to give than all the blessings. My reason is simple gratitude that in a world where the devil wouldn’t even give a 50/50 split, God offers 10/90.

–Doug Inglish is RMC director of planned giving and trust services. Email him at: [email protected]

01 Apr

#adventistchurchtoo #areweasakeplace?

By Samantha Nelson

I invite you to try an experiment with me and see what type of results you get. Ask your church board members during the next meeting if they think their church is a safe place for all. My guess is most will say “yes.” They do believe their church is a safe place.

Now, ask individuals within your church at different times if they feel comfortable bringing a friend or former member to church or inviting someone new to attend. My guess is they will say they are uncomfortable inviting others to attend because they don’t feel the church is a safe place to bring them.

How can this be? Why wouldn’t the church be a safe place? Well, there are many situations that lead people to feel unsafe in a church. Sometimes it is the opinionated person in Sabbath School who does all the talking and intimidates others by doing so. Sometimes it is the person who has no sense of social or personal boundaries who makes others feel uncomfortable in their presence. Sometimes it is the gossip that is known around town as such and when people see her (or him) in church, they worry what gossip will be spread about them. Sometimes it is the “food police” who have to make sure everyone is eating and drinking what they are supposed to be eating and drinking and, if they aren’t, they will certainly tell them about it. Sometimes it is the person with a critical spirit who never has anything nice to say. Sometimes it is the person who simply has to be in control of everything and manipulates others in order to get their way. If they don’t get their way, then watch out— there will be a price to pay!

These and so many other scenarios are played out in our congregations Sabbath after Sabbath and they make people feel uncomfortable and unsafe. However, there is another very real reason people feel unsafe in a congregation. They feel unsafe when someone is abusive in some way, especially sexually. They feel unsafe when they see how little accountability and consequences there are for an offender. And they feel unsafe when they see how little support (as is most often the case) the injured party receives.

Do you know one of the best things about church? It’s the opportunity to come together in fellowship with like- minded believers who extend grace, forgiveness, love, trust, and respect to others.

Do you know one of the worst things about church? Coming together in fellowship with like-minded believers who extend grace, forgiveness, love, trust, and respect to those who have caused great harm to another—through sexual harassment and/or abuse.

Why would I say such a thing? Simply this—too often a predator in our congregational midst—whether in a paid position, such as a pastor or a lay person in a position of spiritual authority, such as an elder, teacher, deacon, youth group leader, etc., who commits the crime (yes, I said crime!) of sexually abusing someone under their care is the one who receives the sympathy, forgiveness, love, respect, trust, and grace in the aftermath of disclosure. Just take a look at the following quote to see what I mean:

“It’s not unusual for ‘hard-core’ child molesters—with more sexual-offense convictions, more victims and younger victims—to be well-respected members of Christian congregations, and to be actively involved as church leaders, warns Victor Vieth, executive director emeritus of the Gundersen National Child Protection Training Center in Winona, Minn.

“In one study, 93 percent of convicted sex offenders described themselves as ‘religious.’ Perhaps surprisingly, many sexual predators consider churches as ‘safe havens,’ Vieth said, with trusting, forgiving adults and easy access to children.

“Religious people can be ‘easier to fool’ than most people, say researchers, and, even when an accusation of child sexual abuse is made, will often stand with the offender, vouching for his good character and even showing up in courtrooms for support.”

What happens to the victim (or oftentimes multiple victims)? The victims are often shunned, blamed, ostracized, and occasionally banned from the congregation. Where is the grace, love, forgiveness, respect, and trust for the victim? It is generally nonexistent. That, my friends, is a very sad statement; yet it is true. And it makes people feel unsafe in church.

As a church member, and even as a pastor’s wife, there are churches where I would not feel safe enough to invite someone to attend with me. Friends, if our churches can’t be safe places for the weary, the wounded, the vulnerable, the ones who need healing, the ostracized and marginalized, then why do we have churches? It’s not the ministry of Jesus to cast out the very ones who need His love and grace the most—the ones who need His healing, tender touch in their lives. How are they to receive that love if we—the church— don’t show it to them through our kindness and compassionate actions?

We must do better at this—it is required of us if we are to be like Jesus! Ps. 147:3 declares, “He healeth the broken in heart, and bindeth up their wounds.” Yet, so often the response from otherwise well-meaning church members is to pour salt in the fresh wounds of abuse by blaming and shaming the victim. This has to stop!

Friends, forgiveness is vital. Grace is necessary. But don’t forget what God has said in Mic. 6:8: “He hath shewed thee, O man, what is good; and what doth the Lord require of thee, but to do justly, and to love mercy, and to walk humbly with thy God?”

Justice . . . that is where we so often fail and that is what makes our churches so unsafe. We often get caught in the forgiveness stage because we want to be loving, forgiving, grace-filled Christians. But we too often forget that forgive- ness does not erase consequences. Forgiveness does not always mean reconciled relationships and one big, happy family. Forgiveness does not overrule justice. When will we reach the point where we actually hold offenders account- able, in love, for their own salvation’s sake? We don’t want to love someone into hell, so to speak, by not allowing them to face the consequences of their actions, even if those consequences may include arrest, imprisonment, and registering as a sex offender. Justice and mercy must go together.

One without the other is not a whole or complete picture of Christ’s love.

Let’s start now to make our churches safer places for all. Let’s stop the gossip, the fault finding, the controlling actions, the boundary pushing, and all that is unlike our Lord.

Let’s stop the sexual predators in our midst—no matter who they are or what positions they may hold.

Let’s forgive and love the offender as they bear the consequences of their actions for the sake of their ultimate salvation.

Let’s love the victim and stop blaming him or her for the downfall of the “admired, loved, well-respected leader.” The downfall is a result of the offender’s actions; it is not a result of a victim telling about the actions of the offender toward them.

Rather than provide a “how-to” list for this article, which you can find in the additional resources below, I chose to appeal to your heart. It’s time for a major shift in our congregations. If we truly believe our Lord is coming soon, then we need to start acting like Him now and show- ing others His great love for them. That love means doing no harm. That love means standing up for victims. That love means holding people accountable for sinful and criminal actions.

Do you really want your church to be a safe place? Then pray for God to fill your heart with His love, His mercy, His forgiveness, and His justice.

–Samantha Nelson is a pastor’s wife and the CEO of The Hope of Survivors, a nonprofit organization dedicated to assisting victims of clergy sexual abuse and providing educational seminars to clergy of all faiths. Email her at: [email protected].

01 Apr

Why is our preaching not working?

By Micheal Goetz

Preaching has always been at the center of Christianity because it has as its foundation the Word of God and preaching is its exposition. Preaching is the most visible part of a pastor’s ministry and it has a significant influence on the spiritual journey of a congregation. It regularly shows up on surveys as being one of the top two reasons an individual attends a church. But while it has been a driver in the Christian church and is today an element that draws the individual to attend church, according to a five-year-old Barna study, 46 percent of regular churchgoers see how the Bible is publicly presented each week and this results in no change in their lives.1

The question begs itself: if preaching has been noted as such an important part of church, why is our preaching not working? “Our” includes both the one in the pulpit and the one in the pew. As any communication guru or counselor will remind us, communication is a two-person activity.

Much of what is considered when we reflect on the public presentation of the Word of God, or preaching, is actually the elements that are the least of what make it “powerful.” Think of preaching as a house. The components of that structure that make it strong are not the factors that can be seen once it is finished. Things like the creative design, paint, wall hangings, or finish work are what make it nice. But that which makes a structure strong, or let’s say powerful, is the foundation, groundwork, and framing or concrete work. It is no different for preaching. What compels preach- ing to be powerful and impacting are factors that cannot be seen. The wall-hangings and finish work of a sermon are nice, like illustrations, creative presentation style, stories, graphics, and such. But we’ll leave those for another time. For now, let’s talk about the foundation and framing of sermons, keeping in mind that these two parts are not visible, but we all feel it when they are not there.

Personal Preparedness

There is that time when the guards were sent to arrest Jesus in Jn. 7, remember? They return empty handed and when the now-angry commanders asked them where was the captive, they responded (verse 46) that they had never heard a man speak as that Man. Isn’t that the style of preacher we want at our church? But the reason for this was that never man lived as He lived. Had His life been other than it was, He could not have spoken as He did.

This often escapes our thinking, that the power of words come from one’s personal, private life. Let me share with you a few lines from my favorite author on prayer and holy living—E.M. Bounds:

The church is looking for better methods; God is looking for better men. . . . What the Church needs today is not more machinery or better, not new organizations or more and novel methods [or better sermons], but men whom the Holy Spirit can use—men of prayer, men mighty in prayer. The Holy Spirit does not flow through methods, but through men. . . . Preaching is not the performance of an hour. It is the outflow of a life. The real sermon is made [or received] in the closet. The man—God’s man— is made in the closet. . . . Prayer makes the man; prayer makes the preacher [listener]; prayer makes the pastor.3

Preachers, our lives must be in pursuit of the holiness of which we preach. Preaching is not personal performance. It is the overflow of the eternal, omnipresent, omnipotent God in you. Our prayer time, lingering in God’s presence, must be long and passionate. Let’s pause on that prayer word for a moment. Martin Luther is known to have said, “If I fail to spend two hours in prayer each morning, the devil gets the victory through the day.” The picture we have of God is that if we bug Him too much, He will get annoyed like the parent who finally responds to the child’s cry of “Mommy! Mommy! Mommy!” However, the Bible is repetitious with narratives and instruction that continual and persistent prayer makes for miracles. God is not a “catch me if you can” god, but gave us the verbal, public proclamation of His word to make miracles happen.

Before you have the ah-ha moment and determine that your preacher must not be very holy or prayerful because the sermons lack inspiration, reread the parenthetical inserts above (which were my additions). Bound’s challenge is as much for the listener as it is for the preacher. One who spends no time learning the voice of God during the week will not recognize Him speaking in any public presentation. The sermon is made from the private and personal meeting with God by both the preacher and the listener.

I grew up in the Pacific Northwest and so my ear naturally catches the news of wildfires. During the year 2017, they weren’t necessarily setting records, but the statistics are big. Since the beginning of this year, 46,951 fires have burned across 7,650,844 acres of the United States, according to the National Interagency Fire Center. You can’t help but reflect that each one of these massive landscape-changing fires started with a single flame. It’s the old campfire chorus, “It only takes a spark to get a fire going . . .” That personal, private, prayer time with God is the flame that can cause the forest-fire-burning we long for in our churches.

Theology of Preaching

The theology of preaching has at its foundation two elements. First, God has chosen to speak and His word is powerful, creative, and effective. Second, God calls humans to be surrogate voices in speaking His word to others. Because of the Holy Spirit, the latter can have the same result as the former.

Often preaching is thought of as being “about” the Word of God and not “the very Word of God.” This nuanced difference may have been or is being cultivated by poor preaching, but it doesn’t change what it is supposed to be.

Preaching through the span, from Noah to the third angel, includes a side of judgment and destruction. Not every time, but a significant number of times, preaching is what provides the opportunity for the individual or community to be saved from either physical harm or eternal destruction. God is love, and He is giving His all for the salvation of mankind (Jn. 3:16). It is fair to conclude that God would only give His best effort to save all (1 Tim. 2:4), and according to the biblical account and command, preaching is one of God’s primary methods to such an extent that in Matt. 10, Jesus told the preachers He was sending them out so that communities would be held accountable in the judgment based on what they had heard preached (v. 15).

God’s Word brought everything in this universe into existence from nothing, but it is not just an historical event of the past, rather it is the breath that sustains and keeps creating life today. Could it be that same Word is what we today call preaching? The answer comes in Romans 10. The sequence described (vv. 13-16) is that those who are lost need to hear in order to believe. However, verse 17 summarizes with a parallel sequence: “So then faith comes by hearing, and hear- ing by the word of God.” The position the preacher occupies in the order presented in verses 13-16 is clarified in verse 17 as being the same position as the Word of God. In preaching then, the preacher and the Word of God become the same.

If preaching is the very Word of God, then how I relate to it as a preacher changes, and how I relate to it as a listener changes. Everything changes if preaching is the proclamation of the Word of God. As a preacher, I come with a holy, prayerful reverence, diligently studying, preparing and practicing the sermon in advance so that when I step into the pulpit, the word spoken is the Word. As a listener, I will come early (or on time), having lingered in prayer listening to His voice through Bible study, surrendering my heart and mind to Him, and petitioning Him for the outpouring of the Holy Spirit on the preacher and on me. Both reactions, from the preacher and the listener, are because God is about to speak.

And when God speaks, preaching does work.

–Micheal Goetz is senior pastor at Campion Seventh-day Adventist Church in Loveland, Colorado. Email him at: [email protected]